- Loading...
- No images or files uploaded yet.
|
|
NE Neuro OutlineNavigate this course: Neuro Outline - Neuro Chat
Sign up is closed now, but follow the first batch of students on the neuroethics blog at http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/.
If you have any questions about this course, please contact neuro@p2pu.org.
Objectives of the Course
The goals of the course are:
Target GroupThis course is intended to Law students and legal professionals who would like to know more about Neuroethics field and to neuroethicists who would like to have a first contact to international human rights law.
Sense maker
This course is going to be conducted and facilitated by Ana Rosa Amorim, international and philosophy of law teacher.
Expectations
This is an introductory college-level seminar. You should plan on investing approximately 12 hours a week in class-related work.
Class Meetings
This class meets only asynchronously online. We may hold optional, synchronous "social" meetings during the our 6 weeks.
AssignmentsWeekly Reading and Blogging
Each week you should read the assigned material and blog answers to the questions for the week, or simply complete assignments for weeks when there are no readings or questions. Your blogging should demonstrate your understanding of the assigned reading material and should include original thoughts and synthesis. Don't just summarize readings. Making connections between the week's readings and either previous readings or previous blogging (of your own or of other students!) is strongly encouraged. Blog posts should be made by 11:59pm Sunday night the week the reading is assigned (see Late Work Policy below). A short final paper will be required at the end of the course. Any topic discussed during the course can be chosen.
Grading
Weekly assignments will be graded according to (1) the degree to which they completely answer the questions asked, (2) the degree to which they demonstrate understanding of the assigned reading material, and (3) the degree to which original thinking is evident in the writing. An extra point may be awarded when a student draws on and references others student writing effectively.
SchedulePART I – Presenting Neuroethics
Week 1: Neuroethics: An emerging field
Objective: Provide an overall perspective on Neuroethics.
Assignments: - Post entries to your blog, answering each one of the questions proposed below.
- Create an wiki page, jointly with your colleagues, presenting brain imaging methods and its relations to Neuroethics. Questions: 1) Is it appropriate to start talking about a neurocentric age? 2) How the emergence of new neurocientific techniques has provoked bioethical issues? 3) Are we our brains? Are all bioethical issues nothing but neuroethical issues? 4) How do cognitive neuroscience and brain imaging contribute to neuroethics field?
Key readings:
#1 Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience, Judy Illes and Stephanie J. Bird (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16859760)
#2 Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical, Martha J. Farah
#3 Comment on “Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics?”, Eric Racine (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2246623&blobtype=pdf)
#4 Human agency in the neurocentric age, Stephen P. R. Rose (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1371044&blobtype=pdf)
#5 Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture - Fracisco Ortega and Fernando Vidal(http://www.brainhood.net/online-texts/ortega_vidal.pdf)
#6 Neuroethics: an agenda for neuroscience and society, Jonathan Moreno
#7Monitoring and manipulating the human brain: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications, Martha J. Farah and Paul Root Wolpe
#8 What is Neuroethics? Questions and Answers with Stephen Hyman http://www.dana.org/news/features/detail.aspx?id=13426
Video resources:
#1 Living in a Neurosociety: A Neuroethics Overview Dr. Martha Farah, Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Natural Sciences and Director of the Penn Center for Neuroscience & Society (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZbG0AxDx7c)
Links: # 1 Neuroethics Core, University of British Columbia http://www.neuroethics.ubc.ca/National_Core_for_Neuroethics/Home.html Excellent website, providing links to resources, neuroethics courses, articles and events. #2 Center for Neuroscience and Society (http://neuroethics.upenn.edu/) Superb collection of articles, videos and information on Neuroethics. # 3 The Oxford Centre for Neuroethics (http://www.neuroethics.ox.ac.uk/) Another good website. #4 Neuroethics Society http://www.neuroethicssociety.org/
Part II – Legal Concepts
Week 2: Introducing International Law – Concepts and main documents
Objective: Provide a first contact to International Human Rights Law.
Assignments: Write a post entry about international human rights law and its relations to life sciences issues. Visit UNESCO website to learn how Universal Declaration on Bioethics was elaborated.
Key readings:
#1 The concept of International Law, Phillip Allott http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/10/1/577.pdf
#2 The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?, David Kennedy http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss15/kennedy.shtml
#3 Universal Declaration of Human Rights http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
# 4 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1883&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Links: # 1 European Journal of International Law links http://www.ejil.org/links/index.php
Week 3: Introducing International Biolaw and Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Objective: Discuss the emergence of International Biolaw as a new field and analyze Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Assignments: Post entries to your blog, answering each one of the questions proposed below. Questions:- Can international law regulate bioethics? - Is it appropriate to talk about the idea of universality and bioethics? - How binding is Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights?
Key readings:
#1 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1883&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
#2 International Law and Life Sciences, Christian Byk http://www.iales.org/doc_anglais/International%20biolaw.pdf
#3 Global bioethics at UNESCO: In defense of Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Roberto Andorno http://www.ethik.uzh.ch/ibme/team/andorno/Andorno-Bioethics_UNESCO.pdf
#4 The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: bioethics, a civilising utopia in the age of globalisation?, Christian Byk
Further readings
#1 The Invaluable Role of Soft Law in the Development of Universal Norms in Bioethics, Roberto Andorno http://www.unesco.de/1507.html?&L=0
# 2 La notion de dignité humaine est-elle superflue en bioéthique?, Roberto Andorno http://www.ethik.uzh.ch/ibme/team/andorno/Andorno-Dignite.pdf (for french speakers)
#3 The right to health in international human rights law, Virginia A. Leary http://www.hhrjournal.org/archives-pdf/4065261.pdf.bannered.pdf
PART III – NEUROETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RELATIONS
Week 4: Self, Enhancement and Human Dignity
Objective: Discuss brain enhancement and its relation to the concept of human dignity.
Assignments: Write a post entry on your blog discussing how brain enhancement impact on identity and on the concept of self and how human dignity legal principle defended by Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights can help preserving identity.
Key readings:
#1 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1883&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
#2 Good, better, best?, Arthur Caplan
#3 Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy, Henry Greely, Philip Campbell, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald C. Kessler, Michael Gazzaniga, and Martha J. Farah
#4 Neurocognitive Enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?, Martha J. Farah, Judy Illes, Robert Cook-Deegan, Howard Gardner, Eric Kandel, Patricia King, Eric Parens, Barbara Sahakian, and Paul Root Wolpe
#5 Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement, Cynthia Forlini and Eric Racine http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2719652&blobtype=pdf&tool=pmcentrez
#6 Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights, Christopher McCrudder http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/19/4/1658.pdf
Further reading:
#1 Health and Human Rights, Jonathan M. Mann and colleagues http://www.hhrjournal.org/archives-pdf/4065260.pdf.bannered.pdf
Video resources:
#1 Steven Pinker chalks it up to the blank slate http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_chalks_it_up_to_the_blank_slate.html
#2 Michael Merzenich on re-wiring the brain http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_merzenich_on_the_elastic_brain.html
#3 Christopher deCharms looks inside the brain http://www.ted.com/talks/christopher_decharms_scans_the_brain_in_real_time.html
Links: #1 Law and Neuroscience Blog http://lawneuro.typepad.com/the-law-and-neuroscience-blog/
Week 5: Brain Imaging and PrivacyObjective: Discuss brain imaging and its impact on right to privacy.
Assignments: Write a post entry on your blog discussing how invasive brain imaging techniques can be. Analyze Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights and see what articles can be applied to situations involving brain scans.
Key readings:
#1 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1883&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
#2 Neuroimaging: Separating the Promise from the Pipe Dreams, Russell A. Poldrack http://www.dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=22220
#3 Monitoring and manipulating the human brain: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications, Martha J. Farah and Paul Root Wolpe
#4 Incidental Findings on Brain Imaging Researches, Judy Illes and colleagues http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1524853&blobtype=pdf
#5 The challenge of incidental findings, Susan M. Wolf, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2587006&blobtype=pdf
#6 Imaging or Imagining, Judy Illes and Eric Racine http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1506750&blobtype=pdf&tool=pmcentrez
Podcast:
#1 Neuroscience and Law http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=82CE9C8B-E7F2-99DF-320EEC8640412E2D
Links: #1 Law and Neuroscience Blog http://lawneuro.typepad.com/the-law-and-neuroscience-blog/
Week 6: Informed Consent
Objective: Discuss how informed consent can be assured during neuro treatments.
Assignments: Post entries to your blog, answering each one of the questions proposed below. Questions: - Can we refuse treatment when we need it? - Who can decide when we can’t? - What principles and guidelines Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights stablish to assure the right to informed consent?
Key readings:
#1 Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment on addicts, Arthur Caplan #2 Protecting the Vulnerable in Brain Research, Robert Cook-Deegan http://www.dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=3262
#3 Neuroscience of decision making and informed consent: an investigation in neuroethics, Georg Northoff http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2563331&blobtype=pdf #4 Ethical Issues in Taking Neuroscience Research from Bench to Bedside, Alan I. Leshner http://www.dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=1094
Links: Neuroethics – another course http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/neuroethics/index.html
FINAL ASSIGNMENTWrite a short paper discussing any of the topics presented during the course.
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.